To view the entire topic, please log in or purchase a subscription.
STS Cardiothoracic Surgery E-Book from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons provides expert guidance for Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery. Sections include Pearson’s General Thoracic, Esphageal, Adult Cardiac, and Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Surgery. Explore these free sample topics:
-- The first section of this topic is shown below --
The medical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is based on knowledge of the pathophysiology of the disease and a defined set of goals based on symptom presentation and severity of mucosal damage. The ideal medical therapy would augment lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and/or reduce the number of transient LES relaxations, improve esophageal clearance of refluxed gastric contents, accelerate gastric emptying, augment mucosal resistance, and neutralize gastric acidity. Unfortunately, no single drug or drug class addresses all these potential pathogenic mechanisms. In fact, most therapies are directed only at acid control (antacids, H2-receptor antagonists [H2RAs], and proton pump inhibitors [PPIs]) yet result in excellent symptom relief and healing of the esophagitis. The expenditure in the United States alone for these antacid medications exceeds $10 billion per year.
The rationale for GERD therapy depends on a careful definition of specific aims. In patients without esophagitis, the therapeutic goals are simply to relieve the acid-related symptoms and to prevent frequent symptomatic relapses. In patients with esophagitis, the goals are to relieve symptoms and to heal the esophagitis while attempting to prevent further relapses and the development of complications (stricture, hemorrhage, or Barrett’s esophagus). These goals are set against a complex background: GERD is a chronic disease that waxes and wanes in intensity, and relapses are common.
-- To view the remaining sections of this topic, please log in or purchase a subscription --
The medical therapy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is based on knowledge of the pathophysiology of the disease and a defined set of goals based on symptom presentation and severity of mucosal damage. The ideal medical therapy would augment lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and/or reduce the number of transient LES relaxations, improve esophageal clearance of refluxed gastric contents, accelerate gastric emptying, augment mucosal resistance, and neutralize gastric acidity. Unfortunately, no single drug or drug class addresses all these potential pathogenic mechanisms. In fact, most therapies are directed only at acid control (antacids, H2-receptor antagonists [H2RAs], and proton pump inhibitors [PPIs]) yet result in excellent symptom relief and healing of the esophagitis. The expenditure in the United States alone for these antacid medications exceeds $10 billion per year.
The rationale for GERD therapy depends on a careful definition of specific aims. In patients without esophagitis, the therapeutic goals are simply to relieve the acid-related symptoms and to prevent frequent symptomatic relapses. In patients with esophagitis, the goals are to relieve symptoms and to heal the esophagitis while attempting to prevent further relapses and the development of complications (stricture, hemorrhage, or Barrett’s esophagus). These goals are set against a complex background: GERD is a chronic disease that waxes and wanes in intensity, and relapses are common.
There's more to see -- the rest of this entry is available only to subscribers.